Search found 464 matches

by dtic
11 Mar 2010, 07:24
Forum: Scan Tailor
Topic: Scan Tailor
Replies: 357
Views: 374059

Re: Scan Tailor

Ok, that I didn't know. But it seems compatible with adding checkmarks. As long as the checkmarks correctly signal to users that the settings and previous outcome for that step will be intact then any reprocessing (behind the scenes) need not be signalled. In cases where users jump directly to stage...
by dtic
10 Mar 2010, 03:10
Forum: Scan Tailor
Topic: Scan Tailor
Replies: 357
Views: 374059

Re: Scan Tailor

Ok, but processing and checking if processing is needed are two things. This would be less confusing: After batch processing a step display a green checkmark icon for it. When batch processing e.g. step 4 then animate the icon for step 4 and previous steps that haven't yet been processed (i.e. steps...
by dtic
09 Mar 2010, 15:01
Forum: Scan Tailor
Topic: Scan Tailor
Replies: 357
Views: 374059

Re: Scan Tailor

Good point on page formatting (sizing) problems if processing two book halfs separately. I didn't think of that. So let's forget 1 then. :) I can follow the other aimed for changes your describe but don't know enough (yet!) about the process and ST to give feedback but thanks for taking a look at ho...
by dtic
08 Mar 2010, 07:30
Forum: Scan Tailor
Topic: Scan Tailor
Replies: 357
Views: 374059

Re: Scan Tailor

Hi. Since it is my first post: what a great forum you've all got going here. Very helpful. Scan Tailor is great. But I hope for two enhancements: dual core processing to speed things up and command line control for more automation. I hope that can be built into ST. But from reading the previous post...