Search found 481 matches
- 04 Oct 2011, 11:01
- Forum: Programs, Software releases, and more.
- Topic: Mac users: jbig2enc is now in Homebrew! (Make better PDFs)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14280
Re: Mac users: jbig2enc is now in Homebrew! (Make better PDF
If you're at the point of running jbig2enc, you should already have processed TIFF files you want to turn into a PDF. If you haven't processed any files with Scan Tailor yet, you should do that first! You can install Scan Tailor in Homebrew by doing brew install scantailor Then run it by typing &quo...
- 30 Sep 2011, 16:10
- Forum: Software
- Topic: jbig2enc: pdf.py patched for right pdf page size
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6838
Re: jbig2enc: pdf.py patched for right pdf page size
This patch is also now available in Homebrew for OS X users. If you have Homebrew, you can install it by doing
If you already have jbig2enc installed, you can get the patched version by doing:
Code: Select all
brew install jbig2enc
Code: Select all
brew uninstall jbig2enc && brew install jbig2enc
- 27 Sep 2011, 11:57
- Forum: Cameras and Electronics
- Topic: Canon a590IS ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6379
Re: Canon a590IS ?
"IS" means image stabilization. So the a590IS presumably compensates for camera shake when shooting at "low shutter speeds". For fixed camera positioning, as in book scanning, I doubt that the "IS" would be all that useful particularly if you shoot with a lot of light....
- 27 Sep 2011, 11:48
- Forum: Scanners and Build Threads
- Topic: .
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7536
Re: Single camera method.
Like you said, Spamsickle, I think that would be the better way. I've used a single-camera scanner using the book-flip method - I scanned every even page, then flipped the book and scanned every odd page. One of the biggest challenges you'll face is consistent, correct camera positioning, which is c...
- 21 Sep 2011, 16:42
- Forum: Scan Tailor
- Topic: Scan Tailor "Enhanced"
- Replies: 82
- Views: 151241
Re: Scan Tailor "Enhanced"
Apologies for the delay, but Scan Taulor Enhanced is now in Homebrew. Mac users who use Homebrew as their package manager can install it by doing brew install scantailor --enhanced If you already have the regular version installed, you can try out Enhanced by doing brew upgrade scantailor --enhanced...
- 07 Sep 2011, 11:28
- Forum: OCR/Optical Character Recognition
- Topic: Cuneiform OCR
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9378
Re: Cuneiform OCR
Tesseract is available for Windows in official CLI form: http://code.google.com/p/tesseract-ocr/downloads/list There are also unofficial (probably unscriptable) GUIs, but I'm not familiar with those. Cuneiform for Windows is also available, but I don't know if it's the same CLI interface as the Linu...
- 02 Sep 2011, 11:59
- Forum: Scan Tailor
- Topic: Scan Tailor "Enhanced"
- Replies: 82
- Views: 151241
Re: Scan Tailor "Enhanced"
Hi, Petr,
Is this release stable enough for general use? Is there a git tag I can use to pull the code in this release? If so, I was going to add this as a build option in Homebrew so Mac users can easily try out the development release.
Is this release stable enough for general use? Is there a git tag I can use to pull the code in this release? If so, I was going to add this as a build option in Homebrew so Mac users can easily try out the development release.
- 01 Sep 2011, 11:14
- Forum: Scanners and Build Threads
- Topic: Top side of platen (question)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6228
Re: Top side of platen (question)
This can also help improve the quality of the photo you take.snaguy wrote:People use black to reduce glare and reflections.
- 01 Sep 2011, 10:11
- Forum: Scanners and Build Threads
- Topic: ION Audio ... the Book Scan
- Replies: 2
- Views: 12980
Re: ION Audio ... the Book Scan
It's been discussed here on the forums. The quality seems iffy from what we know so far, but they're not officially out yet.
- 29 Aug 2011, 15:31
- Forum: Cameras and Electronics
- Topic: Do we actually need portable cameras ?
- Replies: 43
- Views: 55268
Re: Do we actually need portable cameras ?
"Software enhanced" just means that they interpolate the image. It's not true detail. The specifications note that it only captures 1920x1080 - about 2 megapixels. That's plenty good enough for a webcam, just not good enough for us. Which is the problem! There hasn't been a huge market for...