Making it faster: Raspberry Pi 3, better SD-card, other possibilities?
Posted: 30 Mar 2016, 13:25
Hello there,
i am curious if SpreadPi works with that new Raspberry Pi 3... Is there anyone who has tried it yet? It has a wireless-module, a faster processor, more Ram etc.
Do you think the wireless-module will work with spreadpi?
And another little question besides:
I have a Sandisk-Ultra (the one that came with the archivist...)
At Amazon it says it has 25 MB/s writing speed.
There are, of course, better cards available now, some that say 80 MB/s writing speed.
Do you think that will work? Sometimes i am faster than my cameras/my raspberry, or only one camera has saved its image, and then when i click on take the next 2 pictures, there is one page missing... It would be great to have that fixed.
I did one thing i want to tell you:
It is possible to change the Compression Rate of the jpegs in the camera, and even without an energysource, that setting is saved in the camera.
My images hat 3,7MB per img, and now they only have 980KB, which already made a huuuge nice difference in terms of speed and stability.
(And by the way, turning off the camera-sounds is also a huge improvement, but you do that in normal camera settings...)
Greets,
Tobi
i am curious if SpreadPi works with that new Raspberry Pi 3... Is there anyone who has tried it yet? It has a wireless-module, a faster processor, more Ram etc.
Do you think the wireless-module will work with spreadpi?
And another little question besides:
I have a Sandisk-Ultra (the one that came with the archivist...)
At Amazon it says it has 25 MB/s writing speed.
There are, of course, better cards available now, some that say 80 MB/s writing speed.
Do you think that will work? Sometimes i am faster than my cameras/my raspberry, or only one camera has saved its image, and then when i click on take the next 2 pictures, there is one page missing... It would be great to have that fixed.
I did one thing i want to tell you:
It is possible to change the Compression Rate of the jpegs in the camera, and even without an energysource, that setting is saved in the camera.
My images hat 3,7MB per img, and now they only have 980KB, which already made a huuuge nice difference in terms of speed and stability.
(And by the way, turning off the camera-sounds is also a huge improvement, but you do that in normal camera settings...)
Greets,
Tobi